If your team uses spreadsheets next to your system, something is off

Many companies invest serious time and money into building or implementing a system that is supposed to run their operations. It usually covers orders, clients, reporting, and other key parts of the business, and on paper everything should already be in one place.

Then at some point, a spreadsheet appears next to it.

It does not start as a replacement for the system, and nobody plans for it to become important. It is usually created to solve something small, such as getting a clearer overview, tracking a detail that is hard to extract, or simply avoiding too many steps in the system.

What makes this interesting is not the spreadsheet itself, but the fact that it stays.

How it usually develops

In most cases, this begins with a simple need. Someone wants to see data in a slightly different way, or complete a task faster than the system allows, so they export the data or create a new file.

At first, it is used by one person. Then it gets shared. Then someone adds a few more columns, adjusts the structure, or adapts it to their own way of working.

After a while, that file becomes part of the daily routine.

People open it without thinking. They rely on it to understand what is happening. In some cases, it becomes more useful than the system it was supposed to support.

The system is still there, but it slowly moves into the background.

What this looks like in practice

This shows up in different parts of a business, and it is often more visible than people think.

A sales team might use a CRM to log deals and contacts, but still keep a spreadsheet open to track the pipeline in a way that feels clearer and easier to manage. The CRM contains the data, but the spreadsheet becomes the place where decisions are made.

An operations team might have all orders inside the system, including statuses and details, but still manage daily priorities and assignments in Excel because it allows them to move faster and see everything at once without navigating multiple screens.

In finance, reports may be generated directly from the system, but before anything is used, someone exports the data and checks it again manually. Over time, this becomes a standard step, not because it is required, but because it feels safer.

In each of these cases, the system technically works. The issue is that it does not fully support how people need to work on a daily level.

Why this becomes a problem over time

Having a spreadsheet next to a system is easy to accept because each individual step makes sense. It solves a small issue, saves a bit of time, or makes something clearer.

The problem is what happens when this becomes the norm.

Data starts to split between the system and external files, which creates uncertainty around what is actually correct. The same information is updated in multiple places, which increases the risk of errors and takes more time than it should.

Decisions are made based on data that may not be fully aligned, especially if part of the workflow exists outside the system. Even when the system is technically accurate, it no longer represents the full picture.

Over time, the system loses its role as the central place where work happens and where the business is understood.

Why this happens even with good systems

In many cases, the system was not built incorrectly. It was built for a specific stage of the business, with clear processes and a smaller level of complexity.

As the company grows, those processes evolve. New roles appear, responsibilities shift, and workflows become more complex.

The system does not always follow that change at the same pace. Instead, small adjustments are made over time, often focused on individual needs rather than the overall structure.

People then adapt in the only way that allows them to keep working efficiently, which is by creating their own tools around the system.

The spreadsheet is simply the most visible example of that.

What is worth reviewing

When spreadsheets become part of daily operations next to an existing system, it is worth taking a closer look at what is actually happening behind that behavior.

It usually points to specific areas where the system does not support the business well enough.

That might include tasks that require too many steps, data that is difficult to interpret, or workflows that no longer match how teams operate in practice.

Looking at where people leave the system and why they do it often reveals more than reviewing the system itself.

What usually helps

In most cases, the solution is not to remove spreadsheets by force or replace the entire system.

It starts with understanding how people are actually working today and aligning the system with that reality.

That can involve simplifying certain flows, restructuring how data is handled, improving how information is displayed, or removing parts of the process that are no longer needed.

The goal is not to add more features, but to make the system easier to rely on in everyday work.

Where to start

If this situation exists in your team, it is best to start small.

Pick one spreadsheet that is used daily. Not all of them, just one that people rely on the most.

Talk to the people using it and understand why it exists in the first place. What are they trying to achieve with it? What is harder or slower to do inside the system?

This usually reveals the gap very quickly.

From there, compare that workflow with what your system currently allows. Can the same task be done inside the system today? If yes, what makes it difficult to use? If not, what is missing?

Focusing on one clear workflow is often enough to identify where changes are needed. Trying to fix everything at once usually leads to confusion and slow progress.

Ways to resolve this

Once the gaps are clear, there are several ways to approach the problem. The right option depends on how your team works and how large the gap is.

In some cases, the issue is not the system itself, but how it is used. Teams may follow outdated steps or use the system in a way that creates unnecessary work. Adjusting the process and aligning teams on a simpler workflow can remove the need for external files.

In other cases, the system needs small improvements. This can include reducing the number of steps required to complete a task, improving how data is displayed, or adding missing fields that people currently track manually.

Sometimes the issue comes from disconnected tools. Data may exist in multiple systems without proper integration, which leads to exports and manual work. Connecting these tools can remove the need for spreadsheets and keep information in sync.

There are also situations where only one part of the system no longer fits. Instead of replacing everything, it can be enough to rebuild or replace that specific part.

If spreadsheets become central to daily work across multiple teams, it usually points to a larger gap. In those cases, building a custom solution that matches how the business operates can bring everything back into one place.

Frequently asked questions